Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 14:19

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Is it possible for buyers to negotiate after an inspection if the appraisal is lower than expected?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Bitcoin fans aren’t all sold on Trump’s meme coin - NBC News
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Thank you.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
R.I.P Loretta Swit: How well do you remember ''Hot Lips'' Houlihan? - MeTV
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What’s next?
Est dolore nobis praesentium dicta voluptas aut.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Inhibitory Neurons May Hold the Key to Spatial Learning and Memory - Neuroscience News